As Wicker noted, witchcraft is the perfect religion for liberal millennials who are already involved in yoga and meditation, mindfulness, and new-age spirituality. How many witchers are there.
There are two discs and both look like this. Les miserables pbs. There are 3 episodes on both discs and I originally thought I could differentiate based on file size but they're all either 11.5 GB or 12.8 GB.
- C. D. Partenie
National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, Political Science, Faculty Member
National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, Political Science, Faculty Member | Address: “You may already know what a blow to the ego it can be to have to read over anything you wrote 20 years ago, even cancelled checks.” Thomas Pynchon, Slow Learner
269 Followers | 68 Following | | --Total Views
- More
PaperRank:
Edited Books
Contributors: David Lay Williams (DePaul University, Chicago); Zoe Petre, Lazar Vlasceanu (Univer.. more Contributors: David Lay Williams (DePaul University, Chicago); Zoe Petre, Lazar Vlasceanu (University of Bucharest); William Buckingham (De Montfort University, Leicester); Roman Frigg (London School of Economics); Vladimir Mirodan (University of the Arts, London); Ion Tanasescu (Institute of Philosophy, Bucharest); Deirdre McCloskey (University of Illinois, Chicago); Catalin Partenie, Alfred Bulai, Vintila Mihailescu (National School of Political Studies and Administration, Bucharest); Stephen Halliwell (University of St. Andrews)
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
Platon Opere Volumul Viii
PaperRank:
Alexandru Dragomir was a Romanian philosopher, born in 1916. After studying law and phi-losophy a.. more Alexandru Dragomir was a Romanian philosopher, born in 1916. After studying law and phi-losophy at the University of Bucharest (1933–1939), he left Romania to study for a doctorate in philosophy in Freiburg, Germany, under Martin Heidegger. He stayed in Freiburg for two years (1941–1943), but before defending his dissertation, he was called back to Romania for military service and sent to the front. After 1948, historical circumstances forced him to be-come a clandestine philosopher: he was known only within a very limited circle, and even his friends did not know whether or not he was writing down his thoughts. He died in 2002 with-out ever publishing anything. It was only after his death that Dragomir’s notebooks came to light. His work has been published posthumously in five volumes by Humanitas, Bucharest. Two of these volumes have been published in French translation by Jean Vrin, Paris, Banali-tés métaphysiques (2008) and Cahiers du temps (2010), the latter being the fruit of his life-long research on the topic of time (published in German translation by Königshausen & Neu-mann, 2017). The journal Studia Phaenomenologica has devoted a complete issue to Drago-mir (IV, 3–4, 2004), including accounts of his personality and work (in French, German, and English) together with a series of texts by him translated into French and English. In 2009, the Alexandru Dragomir Institute for Philosophy was founded in Bucharest as an independent research institute under the auspices of the Romanian Society for Phenomenology.
For over fifty years, from 1948 to 2000, Dragomir had recorded in six notebooks his thoughts about the nature of time, and interpreted, again and again, those texts in which Plato, Aristo-tle, Plotinus, Augustine, Kant, Hegel, Bergson and others discuss the question of time. He commented upon these texts and attempted to understand for himself the nature of time. Is there a conclusion to his inquiries? ‘There is a primordial passing, that is not the passing of something. “Passing” implies that there is something that passes. “Passing”, however, is a metaphor. No word brings to light, directly, that which I call “passing”. Being is this primor-dial passing; and I cannot think of being without passing, or of passing without being. Time does not pass. If I say so, I think of time as a given primordial element. And it is not. It is be-ing qua passing that makes time possible.’ This is a collation of his thoughts, which he wrote down in 1987 and 1989. He did not show those notebooks to anyone, not even his philosopher friends.
For over fifty years, from 1948 to 2000, Dragomir had recorded in six notebooks his thoughts about the nature of time, and interpreted, again and again, those texts in which Plato, Aristo-tle, Plotinus, Augustine, Kant, Hegel, Bergson and others discuss the question of time. He commented upon these texts and attempted to understand for himself the nature of time. Is there a conclusion to his inquiries? ‘There is a primordial passing, that is not the passing of something. “Passing” implies that there is something that passes. “Passing”, however, is a metaphor. No word brings to light, directly, that which I call “passing”. Being is this primor-dial passing; and I cannot think of being without passing, or of passing without being. Time does not pass. If I say so, I think of time as a given primordial element. And it is not. It is be-ing qua passing that makes time possible.’ This is a collation of his thoughts, which he wrote down in 1987 and 1989. He did not show those notebooks to anyone, not even his philosopher friends.
PaperRank:
This book contains twelve engaging philosophical lectures given by Alexandru Dragomir, most of th.. more This book contains twelve engaging philosophical lectures given by Alexandru Dragomir, most of them given during Romania’s Communist regime. The lectures deal with a diverse range of topics, such as the function of the question, self-deception, banalities with a metaphysical dimension, and how the world we live in has been shaped by the intellect. Among the thinkers discussed in these lectures are Anaxagoras, Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Descartes, and Nietzsche.
Alexandru Dragomir was a Romanian philosopher born in 1916. After studying law and philosophy at the University of Bucharest (1933–1939), he left Romania to study for a doctorate in philosophy in Freiburg, Germany, under Martin Heidegger. He stayed in Freiburg for two years (1941–1943), but before defending his dissertation he was called back to Romania for military service and sent to the front. After 1948, historical circumstances forced him to become a clandestine philosopher: he was known only within a very limited circle. He died in 2002 without ever publishing anything. It was only after his death that Dragomir's notebooks came to light. His work has been published posthumously in five volumes by Humanitas, Bucharest; the present volume is the first to appear in English translation. In 2009, the Alexandru Dragomir Institute for Philosophy was founded in Bucharest as an independent research institute under the auspices of the Romanian Society for Phenomenology.
Alexandru Dragomir was a Romanian philosopher born in 1916. After studying law and philosophy at the University of Bucharest (1933–1939), he left Romania to study for a doctorate in philosophy in Freiburg, Germany, under Martin Heidegger. He stayed in Freiburg for two years (1941–1943), but before defending his dissertation he was called back to Romania for military service and sent to the front. After 1948, historical circumstances forced him to become a clandestine philosopher: he was known only within a very limited circle. He died in 2002 without ever publishing anything. It was only after his death that Dragomir's notebooks came to light. His work has been published posthumously in five volumes by Humanitas, Bucharest; the present volume is the first to appear in English translation. In 2009, the Alexandru Dragomir Institute for Philosophy was founded in Bucharest as an independent research institute under the auspices of the Romanian Society for Phenomenology.
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
Contributors: David Lay Williams (DePaul University, Chicago); Zoe Petre, Lazar Vlasceanu (Univer.. more Contributors: David Lay Williams (DePaul University, Chicago); Zoe Petre, Lazar Vlasceanu (University of Bucharest); William Buckingham (De Montfort University, Leicester); Roman Frigg (London School of Economics); Vladimir Mirodan (University of the Arts, London); Ion Tanasescu (Institute of Philosophy, Bucharest); Deirdre McCloskey (University of Illinois, Chicago); Catalin Partenie, Alfred Bulai, Vintila Mihailescu (National School of Political Studies and Administration, Bucharest); Stephen Halliwell (University of St. Andrews)
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
Alexandru Dragomir was a Romanian philosopher, born in 1916. After studying law and phi-losophy a.. more Alexandru Dragomir was a Romanian philosopher, born in 1916. After studying law and phi-losophy at the University of Bucharest (1933–1939), he left Romania to study for a doctorate in philosophy in Freiburg, Germany, under Martin Heidegger. He stayed in Freiburg for two years (1941–1943), but before defending his dissertation, he was called back to Romania for military service and sent to the front. After 1948, historical circumstances forced him to be-come a clandestine philosopher: he was known only within a very limited circle, and even his friends did not know whether or not he was writing down his thoughts. He died in 2002 with-out ever publishing anything. It was only after his death that Dragomir’s notebooks came to light. His work has been published posthumously in five volumes by Humanitas, Bucharest. Two of these volumes have been published in French translation by Jean Vrin, Paris, Banali-tés métaphysiques (2008) and Cahiers du temps (2010), the latter being the fruit of his life-long research on the topic of time (published in German translation by Königshausen & Neu-mann, 2017). The journal Studia Phaenomenologica has devoted a complete issue to Drago-mir (IV, 3–4, 2004), including accounts of his personality and work (in French, German, and English) together with a series of texts by him translated into French and English. In 2009, the Alexandru Dragomir Institute for Philosophy was founded in Bucharest as an independent research institute under the auspices of the Romanian Society for Phenomenology.
For over fifty years, from 1948 to 2000, Dragomir had recorded in six notebooks his thoughts about the nature of time, and interpreted, again and again, those texts in which Plato, Aristo-tle, Plotinus, Augustine, Kant, Hegel, Bergson and others discuss the question of time. He commented upon these texts and attempted to understand for himself the nature of time. Is there a conclusion to his inquiries? ‘There is a primordial passing, that is not the passing of something. “Passing” implies that there is something that passes. “Passing”, however, is a metaphor. No word brings to light, directly, that which I call “passing”. Being is this primor-dial passing; and I cannot think of being without passing, or of passing without being. Time does not pass. If I say so, I think of time as a given primordial element. And it is not. It is be-ing qua passing that makes time possible.’ This is a collation of his thoughts, which he wrote down in 1987 and 1989. He did not show those notebooks to anyone, not even his philosopher friends.
For over fifty years, from 1948 to 2000, Dragomir had recorded in six notebooks his thoughts about the nature of time, and interpreted, again and again, those texts in which Plato, Aristo-tle, Plotinus, Augustine, Kant, Hegel, Bergson and others discuss the question of time. He commented upon these texts and attempted to understand for himself the nature of time. Is there a conclusion to his inquiries? ‘There is a primordial passing, that is not the passing of something. “Passing” implies that there is something that passes. “Passing”, however, is a metaphor. No word brings to light, directly, that which I call “passing”. Being is this primor-dial passing; and I cannot think of being without passing, or of passing without being. Time does not pass. If I say so, I think of time as a given primordial element. And it is not. It is be-ing qua passing that makes time possible.’ This is a collation of his thoughts, which he wrote down in 1987 and 1989. He did not show those notebooks to anyone, not even his philosopher friends.
PaperRank:
This book contains twelve engaging philosophical lectures given by Alexandru Dragomir, most of th.. more This book contains twelve engaging philosophical lectures given by Alexandru Dragomir, most of them given during Romania’s Communist regime. The lectures deal with a diverse range of topics, such as the function of the question, self-deception, banalities with a metaphysical dimension, and how the world we live in has been shaped by the intellect. Among the thinkers discussed in these lectures are Anaxagoras, Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Descartes, and Nietzsche.
Alexandru Dragomir was a Romanian philosopher born in 1916. After studying law and philosophy at the University of Bucharest (1933–1939), he left Romania to study for a doctorate in philosophy in Freiburg, Germany, under Martin Heidegger. He stayed in Freiburg for two years (1941–1943), but before defending his dissertation he was called back to Romania for military service and sent to the front. After 1948, historical circumstances forced him to become a clandestine philosopher: he was known only within a very limited circle. He died in 2002 without ever publishing anything. It was only after his death that Dragomir's notebooks came to light. His work has been published posthumously in five volumes by Humanitas, Bucharest; the present volume is the first to appear in English translation. In 2009, the Alexandru Dragomir Institute for Philosophy was founded in Bucharest as an independent research institute under the auspices of the Romanian Society for Phenomenology.
Alexandru Dragomir was a Romanian philosopher born in 1916. After studying law and philosophy at the University of Bucharest (1933–1939), he left Romania to study for a doctorate in philosophy in Freiburg, Germany, under Martin Heidegger. He stayed in Freiburg for two years (1941–1943), but before defending his dissertation he was called back to Romania for military service and sent to the front. After 1948, historical circumstances forced him to become a clandestine philosopher: he was known only within a very limited circle. He died in 2002 without ever publishing anything. It was only after his death that Dragomir's notebooks came to light. His work has been published posthumously in five volumes by Humanitas, Bucharest; the present volume is the first to appear in English translation. In 2009, the Alexandru Dragomir Institute for Philosophy was founded in Bucharest as an independent research institute under the auspices of the Romanian Society for Phenomenology.
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
Pour obtenir une mise à jour des aspects polymorphes du mythe revitalisé dans la philosophie de P.. more Pour obtenir une mise à jour des aspects polymorphes du mythe revitalisé dans la philosophie de Platon, il a semblé utile à l’auteur de dresser premièrement, tout au long des pages qui suivent, le bilan de deux études dont la teneur lui permet de situer quelques enjeux importants de cette problématique. Dans une deuxième partie, à publier ultérieurement, il présentera ses propres approches dans le domaine du langage mythique.
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
It's regrettable to have to call this collection pioneering, since others should have thought of .. more It's regrettable to have to call this collection pioneering, since others should have thought of it; but kudos to Catalin Partenie for showing us that Plato was as much myth-maker as myth-analyst. His introduction is so clear and perceptive that it dispels the old notion that commentators inevitably bury their subjects. In Partenie's analysis, Plato stood between the ancient understanding of myth, and the modern. In other words, he understood the power of myth to reveal sacred or philosophical truths while remaining sceptical about its factual basis. Images are useful insofar as they reveal Forms, but they are not the Forms themselves. The myths are as immortal as the hills: the tale, in the Symposium, of the Androgyne, the origin of love; the tale of the cave, in which we are taught to reject the reflection of truth and to pursue the truth itself; the stern story of the Judgement of Souls, with its salutary reminder that those who think, or at least take thought seriously, are more likely to enter paradise. Plato's ideas concerning the immortality of the soul are revealed as more problematic and less easy to assimilate within the Christian tradition than I had realised. On the evidence of this book, even implacable atheists like Richard Dawkins might find themselves more on the side of the clerics than on Plato's.
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
Constitutional Political Economy , 2019
In his Politics VI 3, 1318a-b, Aristotle discusses constitutional procedures for achieving justic.. more In his Politics VI 3, 1318a-b, Aristotle discusses constitutional procedures for achieving justice in a society where its classes have diferent views on it. He analyzes the case of a society consisting in two groups, the poor and the rich, each holding a speciic understanding of justice (democratic or oligarchic). In this paper we give, irst, a non-formal summary of this section of Politics. Then we approach it in the framework of social choice theory and argue that a social rule for selecting between alternatives may be extracted from it. As Aristotle argued, this rule is consistent with the views on justice and equality of the supporters of both democracy and oligarchy. Finally, we study its properties, as well as some extensions of it when multiple classes are allowed or more than two alternatives are present. 'At its most general and fundamental level Aristotle's analysis of the polis is a highly abstract exercise in rational choice theory' (Schofield 2005, p. 318).
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
Download
Readers Related Papers MentionsView Impact
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
What the ancient Greeks—at least in the archaic phase of their civilization —called muthos was qu.. more What the ancient Greeks—at least in the archaic phase of their civilization —called muthos was quite different from what we and the media nowadays call ' myth '. For them a muthos was a true story, a story that unveils the true origin of the world and human beings. For us a myth is something to be ' debunked ' : a widespread, popular belief that is in fact false. In archaic Greece the memorable was transmitted orally through poetry, which often relied on myth. However, starting with the beginning of the seventh century BC two types of discourse emerged that were set in opposition to poetry: history (as shaped by, most notably, Thucydides) and philosophy (as shaped by the peri phuseōs tradition of the sixth and fifth centuries BC). These two types of discourse were naturalistic alternatives to the poetic accounts of things. Plato broke to some extent from the philosophical tradition of the sixth and fifth centuries in that he uses both traditional myths and myths he invents and gives them some role to play in his philosophical endeavor. He thus seems to attempt to overcome the traditional opposition between muthos and logos. There are many myths in Plato's dialogues: traditional myths, which he sometimes modifies, as well as myths that he invents, although many of these contain mythical elements from various traditions. Plato is both a myth teller and a myth maker. In general, he uses myth to inculcate in his less philosophical readers noble beliefs and/or teach them various philosophical matters that may be too difficult for them to follow if expounded in a blunt, philosophical discourse. More and more scholars have argued in recent years that in Plato myth and philosophy are tightly bound together, in spite of his occasional claim that they are opposed modes of discourse.
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
Review available at: http://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2009/2009-10-50.html
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
Photo of Dragomir courtesy of Humanitas (c) 2018
PaperRank:
Translation from the English into German by Karla Fabry; originally published in Dublin Review of.. more Translation from the English into German by Karla Fabry; originally published in Dublin Review of Books, 1 (2018). 'Ich werde nie den Tag vergessen, an dem ich ihm begegnete. Im Dezember 1985, kurz vor Weihnachten, lud mich Constantin Noica, einer der bekanntesten rumänischen Philosophen, in die Wohnung eines
Freundes zu einem privaten Vortrag über
Platons Ideen ein.'
Freundes zu einem privaten Vortrag über
Platons Ideen ein.'
PaperRank:
Do you remember Kubrick’s famous cut in 2001, where we get from a bone rotating in the air (the f.. more Do you remember Kubrick’s famous cut in 2001, where we get from a bone rotating in the air (the first tool) to spaceships waltzing in space to “The Blue Danube”? I can’t think of anything more off the wall than “The Blue Danube” to use in a scene introducing our life in the future. But it makes sense, since the path from the bone to the spaceship is like a river.
PaperRank:
The Romanian philosopher Alexandru Dragomir was a pupil of Heidegger in Germany until 1943, when .. more The Romanian philosopher Alexandru Dragomir was a pupil of Heidegger in Germany until 1943, when he was conscripted into the Romanian army. In the communist period, he had to hide this background. He never published, but after his death, almost a hundred notebooks were found among his belongings.
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
Dragomir was not interested in writing philosophy, although his archive amounts to almost 100 not.. more Dragomir was not interested in writing philosophy, although his archive amounts to almost 100 notebooks, containing fragments, notes, essays and studies. This essay addresses Dragomir's disregard for written philosophy and argues that his main message will lose its force in his posthumously published archive. His message, as it emerges from the way he lived his life, is, I argue, this: if we are to restore the lost harmony of our lives, philosophy, as essential as it may be, isn't everything.
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
A Conference on the hermeneutic role of fiction in social sciences. Speakers included: Prof. Vlad.. more A Conference on the hermeneutic role of fiction in social sciences. Speakers included: Prof. Vladimir Mirodan (University of the Arts, London), Dr. Roman Frigg (London School of Economics), Dr. Edward Kanterian (University of Kent), Prof. Mircea Dumitru (University of Bucharest).
PaperRank:
Simpozion organizat impreuna cu Alfred Bulai (conf. univ. dr., SNSPA).
PaperRank:
A major grant was awarded by Pasts, Inc. Centre for Historical Studies, Central European Universi.. more A major grant was awarded by Pasts, Inc. Sims 3 girl child clothes. Centre for Historical Studies, Central European University, to organize this conference. Speakers included: David Sedley (Cambridge), Christopher Rowe (Durham), Richard Stalley (Glasgow), and Elizabeth McGrath (Warburg Institute, University of London)
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
PaperRank:
Download
Readers Related Papers MentionsView Impact
Supported by The Leverhulme Trust, Higher Education Innovation Fund, King’s College London Busine.. more Supported by The Leverhulme Trust, Higher Education Innovation Fund, King’s College London Business Ltd, and The Romanian Cultural Institute in London. Participants included: Prof. Nick Barton (Oxford), Prof. Yulia Ustinova (Ben-Gurion), Prof. Marie-José Mondzain (CNRS, Paris), Prof. Maiike Bleeker (Utrech), Prof. Freddie Rokem (Tel-Aviv), Prof. Joe Kelleher (Roehampton), and Turner Prize nominee Roger Hiorns.
PaperRank:
This book contains twelve engaging philosophical lectures, most of them given during Romania’s Co.. more This book contains twelve engaging philosophical lectures, most of them given during Romania’s Communist regime. They were written by Alexandru Dragomir, a former student of Heidegger who never published anything in his lifetime. The lectures deal with a diverse range of topics, such as the function of the question, self-deception in the past, the present, and the future, and banalities with a metaphysical dimension. The book includes a phenomenological discussion of the topic of nation and examines what happens when the human race loses its sense of measure. It also addresses the true role of the intellect in contrast with the dominance of scientific abstraction in today’s technical world. Among the thinkers discussed are Anaxagoras, Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Descartes, and Nietzsche.
Alexandru Dragomir was born in 1916 in Romania. After studying law and philosophy at the University of Bucharest (1933–1939), he left Romania to study for a doctorate in philosophy in Freiburg, Germany, under Martin Heidegger. He stayed in Freiburg for two years (1941–1943), but before defending his dissertation he was called back to Romania for military service and sent to the front. After 1948, historical circumstances forced him to become a clandestine philosopher: he was known only within a very limited circle, and even his friends did not know whether or not he was giving concrete expression to his philosophical preoccupations in a written work. He died in 2002 without ever publishing anything. It was only after his death that the “Dragomir notebooks” came to light.
Alexandru Dragomir was born in 1916 in Romania. After studying law and philosophy at the University of Bucharest (1933–1939), he left Romania to study for a doctorate in philosophy in Freiburg, Germany, under Martin Heidegger. He stayed in Freiburg for two years (1941–1943), but before defending his dissertation he was called back to Romania for military service and sent to the front. After 1948, historical circumstances forced him to become a clandestine philosopher: he was known only within a very limited circle, and even his friends did not know whether or not he was giving concrete expression to his philosophical preoccupations in a written work. He died in 2002 without ever publishing anything. It was only after his death that the “Dragomir notebooks” came to light.
PaperRank:
Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Opere VII: Philebos, Timaios, Critias” as Want to Read:
Rate this book
See a Problem?
We’d love your help. Let us know what’s wrong with this preview of Opere VII by Plato.
Not the book you’re looking for?Preview — Opere VII by Plato
Dialogurile Philebos, Timaios şi Critias; ediţie îngrijită de Petru Creția.
Traduceri, lămuriri preliminare şi note:
Philebos - Andrei Cornea
Timaios - Cătălin Partenie
Critias - Cătălin Partenie
Traduceri, lămuriri preliminare şi note:
Philebos - Andrei Cornea
Timaios - Cătălin Partenie
Critias - Cătălin Partenie
Published 1993 by Editura Ştiinţifică (first published May 1st 1991)
To see what your friends thought of this book,please sign up.
To ask other readers questions aboutOpere VII,please sign up.
This book is not yet featured on Listopia.Add this book to your favorite list »
Rating details
|
Ernesto Plasencia rated it really liked it
Jan 10, 2018
Jan 10, 2018
Moriarty Mayfair rated it it was amazing
May 15, 2017
May 15, 2017
julián medrano hoyos rated it it was amazing
Jul 22, 2017
Jul 22, 2017
Sibilla Cumana rated it it was amazing
Aug 02, 2013
Aug 02, 2013
Pere Torrellas rated it it was amazing
Nov 28, 2018
Nov 28, 2018
Murat S. Dural rated it really liked it
Sep 29, 2014
Sep 29, 2014
Waldo Geraldo Faldo rated it really liked it
Jan 16, 2017
Jan 16, 2017
Ana Maria Giraldo Giraldo rated it it was amazing
May 03, 2019
May 03, 2019
Lorena Cano Cavero rated it it was amazing
May 22, 2018
May 22, 2018
Sara Otazu Cantié rated it really liked it
Mar 05, 2017
Mar 05, 2017
Francisco Lizama marked it as to-read
Aug 05, 2016
Aug 05, 2016
Mariajosefernandez marked it as to-read
Sep 21, 2016
Sep 21, 2016
Diego Echeverria marked it as to-read
Oct 09, 2016
Oct 09, 2016
Claudia La Valle marked it as to-read
Dec 21, 2016
Dec 21, 2016
Marcos Ramses Meléndez Valles marked it as to-read
Jun 03, 2018
Jun 03, 2018
There are no discussion topics on this book yet.Be the first to start one »
Recommend It | Stats | Recent Status Updates
4,316followers
(Greek: Πλάτων) (Arabic: أفلاطون) (Alternate Spelling: Platon, Platón, Platone)
Plato is a Classical Greek philosopher, mathematician, student of Socrates, writer of philosophical dialogues, and founder of the Academy in Athens, the first institution of higher learning in the Western world. Along with his mentor, Socrates, and his student, Aristotle, Plato helped to lay the foundations of Western p..more
Plato is a Classical Greek philosopher, mathematician, student of Socrates, writer of philosophical dialogues, and founder of the Academy in Athens, the first institution of higher learning in the Western world. Along with his mentor, Socrates, and his student, Aristotle, Plato helped to lay the foundations of Western p..more